As a coach and athlete, I have spent years refining my training methodologies. Primarily, I have relied on conjugate-style programming for powerlifting. However, as I prepared for my recent Olympic weightlifting meet, I realized the heightened dependency on technique in weightlifting necessitated keeping the main variation in the program every week. This discovery led to an insightful comparison of peaking strategies for powerlifting and Olympic weightlifting.
Powerlifting Peaking: A Steady Build
For most of my powerlifting lifts, I have found an optimal peaking strategy using consistent 2.5% increases in intensity. This low and steady progression closely mimics a linear progression model while maintaining volume consistency week to week.
Variation Specificity: Over the weeks, I incorporate variations that increasingly mirror the main lift. This progression helps dial in technique while accommodating individual needs. For example:
Week 1: Front squat with 100-pound chains
Week 2: Front squat with 80-pound chains
Week 3: Front squat with 60-pound chains
Week 4: Front squat with 40-pound chains
Week 5: Front squat with 20-pound chains
Week 6: Front squat with no chains
By gradually reducing accommodating resistance, the movement becomes more specific to the competition lift, allowing for improved technique under increasingly realistic conditions.
Percent-Based Training: I begin at 90% of my max and gradually increase the intensity by 2.5% each week. Volume is kept minimal, often focusing on a single heavy rep per week for movements like the squat and deadlift. A typical progression might look like this:
Week 1: 90%
Week 2: 92.5%
Week 3: 95%
Week 4: 97.5%
Week 5: 100%
Week 6: 101-102.5% (I do not exceed 2.5%)
This approach has consistently delivered results, with multiple PRs achieved under its framework. For example, I’ve hit PRs in the sumo deadlift using straight weight and in the front squat and reverse band deadlift with accommodating resistance.
Olympic Weightlifting: A Technique-Driven Approach
In contrast, peaking for Olympic weightlifting requires a different strategy due to the sport’s heavy reliance on precision and technique. For snatches and clean & jerks, I found it effective to start at around 80% of my max and increase intensity by 2.5% weekly. The total volume remains at approximately 10 reps per session.
This method allows me to:
Retain and improve technique under heavier loads. A typical progression might look like this:
Week 1: 80%
Week 2: 82.5%
Week 3: 85%
Week 4: 87.5%
Week 5: 90%
Week 6: 92.5%
Week 7: 95%
Week 8: 97.5%
Week 9: 100-102.5%
Gradually build confidence leading up to competition without risking form breakdown. As I approach 100%, I refer to Prilepin’s chart to adjust the number of reps as needed, ideally maintaining no fewer than four total reps over 90%.
Heading into my next Olympic weightlifting meet, I don’t plan to max out in training. Unlike powerlifting, where maxing out in training provides a clear gauge for attempts on meet day, Olympic weightlifting demands a more cautious approach to preserve technique integrity. Instead, my goals for the meet are:
Exceeding my competition averages.
If everything aligns perfectly, attempting a meet PR or even an all-time PR.
The Crossover: Lessons and Questions
This experience raises an intriguing question: Why not apply the same progressive methodology to powerlifting? The answer, for now, lies in context. While a slower, steady progression can work for rebuilding from an injury or addressing specific weaknesses, powerlifting also benefits from targeting strength across different angles and variations. This approach helps ensure long-term progress by building resilience and addressing technical nuances.
For Olympic weightlifting, however, my training age is still relatively young, and my technique requires more frequent reinforcement. This necessitates higher volumes at submaximal weights with slower percentage increases. As my technique improves, I expect to maintain these improvements with less volume, bridging the gap between competition phases and general strength phases in both Olympic weightlifting and powerlifting.
Final Thoughts
The interplay between these two disciplines highlights the importance of adaptability in training. Whether you're chasing PRs in powerlifting or refining technique in Olympic weightlifting, the right peaking strategy can make all the difference. As I continue experimenting and refining, I’ll be watching closely to see how these methods evolve and intersect over time.